home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0039>
- <title>
- Jan. 07, 1991: A Tale of Two Bushes
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Jan. 07, 1991 Men Of The Year:The Two George Bushes
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- MEN OF THE YEAR, Page 18
- A Tale of Two Bushes
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>One finds a vision on the global stage; the other still
- displays none at home
- </p>
- <p>By George J. Church
- </p>
- <p> The traditional standard for TIME's Man--or Woman--of
- the Year is that the person be the one who, for better or for
- worse, has had the most impact on the year's events. For better
- or for worse: many selections have qualified on the first part
- of this criterion, some notable ones on the second. George Bush,
- however, is unique: the first to be chosen because he fits both
- aspects of the definition. He seemed almost to be two Presidents
- last year, turning to the world two faces that were not just
- different but also had few features in common. One was a foreign
- policy profile that was a study in resoluteness and mastery, the
- other a domestic visage just as strongly marked by wavering and
- confusion.
- </p>
- <p> The march of events since Iraq's invasion of Kuwait has by
- now acquired an air of inevitability. In fact, it was not at all
- inevitable that Saudi Arabia would welcome an American army. Or
- that 26 other nations would join the U.S. in sending troops to
- the region. Or that the Soviet Union would become an American
- ally in all but name, voting in the United Nations to approve
- the use of force against its very recent client state, Iraq. The
- worldwide coalition against Iraq, the suffocating embargo, the
- massing of an international army to confront Saddam--all
- happened because George Bush drew on all his experience of
- international affairs, all his carefully cultivated relations
- with foreign leaders (yes, those incessant phone calls that
- prompted such snickering) to make them happen.
- </p>
- <p> If Bush has led the U.S. to the brink of a possibly
- wrenching war, he has also raised a vision of a new world order.
- In it, the U.S. and the Soviet Union, the superpowers that kept
- the world in dread of nuclear annihilation for 40 years, would
- cooperate to maintain peace and order, and the U.N. would deter
- aggression as its founders intended 45 years ago. By midwifing
- this new order, Bush had a decidedly favorable impact on the
- course of events.
- </p>
- <p> But domestic policy! What could have been more baffling, at
- times ludicrous, than Bush's performance on taxes. It was not
- his repudiation of the "read my lips" pledge; the only thing
- wrong with his retreat from that cynical vow was that it took so
- long in coming. What was truly embarrassing was his whirligig
- behavior afterward: four reversals within three days on the kind
- of deal with Congress he would accept. Bush climaxed that
- bewildering gyration with his "read my hips" silliness--then
- topped it off later with a fresh "no new taxes" pledge that
- nobody could believe.
- </p>
- <p> The actual budget deal, though deeply flawed, will at least
- begin the painful process of reducing the deficit. But Bush half
- drifted, half let himself be pushed into it, and that was no
- accident. His domestic policy, to the extent that he has one,
- has been to leave things alone until he could no longer avoid
- taking action. That strategy of deliberate drift burdens the
- nation with a host of problems that have become worse over the
- past decade: drugs, homelessness, racial hostility, education,
- environment. In sharp contrast to his foreign policy
- performance, Bush affected domestic events decidedly for the
- worse.
- </p>
- <p> Of course there is only one George Bush, and the following
- stories explore the paradox of his two policy faces. In part, it
- is a simple matter of interest. Global diplomacy is what he has
- trained for and what absorbs him; domestic affairs are just not
- as much fun. But it is also that he has mastered a technique of
- policy formulation--hatching backstage deals with a small
- group of leaders whose confidence he has carefully cultivated
- over the years--that works much better abroad than at home.
- The catch is that foreign and domestic policy cannot always be
- compartmentalized: Bush's love of secrecy and inability to
- articulate his goals (or is it his aversion to doing so?) could
- yet cost him the public support essential to waging successful
- war, if that is where the confrontation with Saddam Hussein is
- leading.
- </p>
- <p> In any event, Bush put his distinctive stamp--or rather,
- two distinctive stamps--on the year's news. For better and for
- worse, the two George Bushes are TIME's 1990 Men of the Year.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-